STRmix is a software for the interpretation of complex DNA profiles.  The three developers are Dr Duncan Taylor (Forensic Science South Australia), Dr Jo-Anne Bright and myself from ESR in New Zealand.  We do not receive any benefit direct or indirect from sales of STRmix.  We are all civil servants on the pay of our respective states.

Information on access to STRmix™ software by defense legal teams can be found here [PDF, 352 KB].  Copyright and disclaimer can be found here [PDF, 85 KB].

It is currently in use in 18 labs in the US, all 8 State and territory labs in Australasia, and 4 labs elsewhere

See here for a fill list Labs live

A non-exhaustive list of US cases:

Mi v Muhammad muhammad-daubert-transcript,p-v-muhammad-12-3-15,michigan-v-muhammad,

NY v Bullard-Daniels , Niagara County strmix-niagara-county-ny-decision-_201603101415

State of Texas vs. Michael Shane Clack. Daubert/admissibility hearing April/20/16,

State of Texas vs. Roy Edward Smith April/20/16 Smith County near the Dallas area.

Appeal Roy Edward Smith v Texas 16-139-CR Smithv StateApr 28’17

Henry Watkins Skinner v Texas June 8th 2016 Skinner v State Tex_ Court of Criminal Appeals 2016 – Google Scholar

People v. Irby (heard in Michigan).  June 21st 2016

People v  Sayers (Mi) 9th November 2016,

Daubert  People v Herbert Alford (Mi) 16th November 2016,herbert-alford-opn-and-order-re-strmix-m-in-limine-11-28-16

Florida vs. Marc Regisme Daubert hearing denied 22nd November 2016, state_v-_regisme-daubert-denial

United States v Pettway (New York) October 21, 2016 https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-pettway-7

People v Hillary (NY) hillary-08-26-16-decision-and-order-dna-analysis-admissibility07-25-16-fye-hearing-transcript

Florida v Dwayne Cummings 12th may 2017 State of Florida v Dwayne Cummings Daubert Denied

Uncontested STRmix trials

People of the State of Michigan v. Charles Cox July 2016 Wayne County (Detroit)

Texas (includes the two Texas cases above above)

County Court Court Date Lab Accepted
BRAZORIA District 4/20/2016 Houston Yes
CAMERON District 6/7/2016 Weslaco Yes
COLLIN District 7/13/2016 Garland Yes
EL PASO District 6/22/2016 ElPaso Yes
HUNT District 4/29/2016 Garland Yes
MIDLAND 385th District 5/11/2016 Lubbock Yes
NUECES 6/16/2016 CorpusChristi Yes
NUECES District 5/31/2016 CorpusChristi Yes
POTTER District 5/17/2016 Lubbock Yes
SMITH 114th District 4/20/2016 Garland Yes

Non-US

R v Pfening (Australia) r-v-pfennig-judgement-11-nov-2016

R v Tuite, Tuite v R (Australia) tuite-v-the-queen-2015-vsca-148tuite-interlocutory-appeal-decision

R v Sandra Weir (Scotland) for the murder of Mary Logie High Court in Edinburgh 5th January 2017.  Mr report was agreed with the defence who were Beltrami solicitors.  The Scottish Police Agency scientist was asked me in court why they had sent work to ESR, how we sent the data, how the software works and if it is accepted in the scientific community

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/12/15/woman-guilty-breathtakingly-wicked-murder-trusting-elderly-neighbour/

Josephus Marinus Johannes de Graef 21st November 2016

Due to the difficult LCN-profiles (34 cycles Identifiler, three replicates) this was a very special case. It was the first case in the Netherlands where the DNA-evidence was discussed in such detail. The probabilistic software and the outcome of three programs (LRmix, TrueAllele, STRmix) was discussed.

The judges found the DNA-evidence of STRmix and LRmix/ Mixcall (in-house developed version of LRmix) reliable. In the link below, under chapter “7.3.1 Weergave van de likelihood ratio’s.” you can find a table with results of Netherlands Forensic Institute and STRmix. They are similar.  TrueAllele gave different result.

TrueAllele was run on only one replicate although be capable of being run on all three.  The effect of replication is very considerable especially at low-template.  Hence it would be unfair to score the TrueAllele result against the other two.

http://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/inziendocument?id=ECLI:NL:RBOBR:2016:6438

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s